Dear @tapbots and @CastroPodcasts: I noticed a weird display bug that seems to be an iOS issue, as it affects both your apps.
In the summary descriptions of episodes and in quoted tweets, the text gets repeated over two lines in a weird way.
@FoldableHuman Hot take incoming: Tastes differ a lot between people. I’ve had vegan stuff recommended for me by omni friends/family that I did not get at all (and vice versa ofc).
I don’t know the US-market well, but in Germany there are a bunch of (very different) vegan nuggets et al.
@tapbots Lovely update! Quick question: Is there still a way to scroll up to the last read tweet in the timeline? Tapping the status bar brings you to the top of the timeline and before the update you could tap the unread counter would bring you back to the oldest new tweet.
@Bachl Yeah, exactly. That’s why it ended up in that category. TikTok’s parent company ByteDance also has ties to Chinese state institutions and any regulatory actions are tough to implement.
Also: There are definitely pro-democratic and “light” ways to use those dark platforms!
The dark social channels can be split into: »private-first channels«, such as instant messengers, which primarily served private communication and »private rooms«, which are a part of larger social media (e.g., closed Facebook groups).
»Context-bound alternative social media« also resemble the familiar social media in design and functionality. They function as an alternative primarily through their orientation to their contexts of origin, where different legal frameworks apply (e.g. VKontakte)
»Fringe communities« are not about imitating mainstream social media or addressing a mainstream audience. They target specific subcultures where communication is often difficult to grasp for outsiders (e.g. 4Chan).
Quick summary of what we found:
We distinguish between 2 categories of #DarkSocialMedia (alternative social media & dark social media), with 5 subtypes in total. This helps to understand the technical affordances and (communication) norms on these platforms.
»Social counter-media« orient themselves in functionality or design towards specific mainstream offerings while positioning themselves as a “safe haven” for content and people who feel ostracized or otherwise marginalized in “mainstream” social media (e.g. Gab vs Twitter).
As a companion piece for the German-language @core_nrw Expert Report (see this 🧵 for more details twitter.com/Lenafrescament…), we (@Lenafrescamente, Julia Völker and me) focused this paper on the methodology of the two studies and summarize their results!
Just in time for the weekend (I'm sure ya'll love to read papers on #DarkSocial on your off-days): Our research paper on "Dark Social Media as Opportunity Structures for Extremism" is now online!
A short 🧵 (8 tweets) on what's going on here!
@KeatonPatti @GabrielBerlin Buzzkill incoming: Die Screenshots sind wohl nicht authentisch: twitter.com/ddale8/status/…
Als Joke gut, aber leider ist auch satirische Misinformation ein Problem in diesem Ökosystem
“What if we force scarcity onto this, to trick people into thinking they can magically become millionaires by collecting Beanie Baby ghosts?”
@_badura Soweit ich weiß, kriegt man pro „Werk“ nur einmalig eine Ausschüttung. Also sind die Beiträge, die schon gemeldet sind, eh nicht mehr relevant.
@mariabloec It at first you don’t succeed, try, try and write some code to do the work 🙏🏻
Everyone is playing WORDLE and I suck at word puzzles. To remedy this issue, I wrote some #rlang code to help solve WORDLEs with the power of #regex!
Check out the code, how it works, and how to use it over here: https://t.co/kYwUXGBGCB
@Menschette Weiß nicht, ob Adventure, aber zuletzt haben wir (Freundin und ich) „Night in the Woods“ gespielt und „Firewatch“ hat uns auch gut gefallen. Sehr unterschiedliche Spiele, aber beide toll.
@holnburger Ich bin schon gespannt, ob und wenn ja, wie Regulierung für Telegram kommen werden. Letztendlich bleibt ja nicht viel, bis auf Zusammenarbeit mit Apple/Google.
@everytstudies I’d argue that the reactions are a sign that there might have been a reason to suspect intention to upset. But I might be lacking cultural knowledge (I don’t unterstand the significance of the number(?) and don’t know the organization well)
@everytstudies But couldn’t you see this apology as an attempt to communicate intent? You have to assume communicative intent to begin with; it’s not just known a priori.
@vodafoneservice Kurze Frage: Lese ich die Support-Foren richtig, dass als NRW Vodafone Kunde der Bridge Mode an der Vodafone Station gerade nicht aktiviert werden kann? Wird das zeitnah möglich sein oder eher nicht? Danke!
@chainsawriot I guess you could also argue that the ICA submission site is potentially dangerous.
"It is not hyperbolic to claim that in recent years we have witnessed an explosion of new academic publications on conspiracies. […] One might rightfully ask: is there anything original and useful left to say about conspiracies?" (Hansson, in press)
@everytstudies A shorthand for “what you said crosses a line, because it’s not just disagreement with a position, but with the free existence of a group of people.” 2/2
@everytstudies It’s interesting what is deemed a -phobia and what is not. Just from my cultural perspective, it is used to label attitudes against marginalized groups. 1/2
@everytstudies i.e. homophobia for people that say it’s a choice who you are attracted to but not bayesphobia for a frequentist statistician.
@everytstudies Cleese’s example shows that well. Of course you would not use the term -phobic to describe a simple disagreement. It is used when people “disagree” with an other’s essential way of life.
@everytstudies I feel like “disagreeing with someone on something relevant to their interest” doesn’t do justice to an argument that “disagrees” with something that is very central to their identity, e.g. gender.
Phrasing it this way is the essential issue here, I think.
Toller Text von @samelou im Spiegel über Habermas und was von den habermas’schen Idealen heute noch übrig ist. So pessimistisch sind seine »Überlegungen und Hypothesen zu einem erneuten Strukturwandel der politischen Öffentlichkeit« gar nicht.
So, the moral of the story is: Anti-piracy measures (propitiatory file formats, DRM, etc.) only hurt users who don't pirate. And buying ebooks in 2021 is still a huge pain if you don't like Amazon.
Bonus moral: Don't buy a Kindle.
Sadly I could not convert this epub into something my Kindle could open, because it was locked with DRM. At this point I gave up, pirated the book and had it on my Kindle two minutes later.
I wanted to buy Steven Pinker’s Rationality. I own a Kindle, but I didn’t want to buy the book from Amazon (cause, you know …). So I looked for an independent ebook store and bought the book there. So far so good.